You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
cupSODA: A CUDA-Powered Simulator of Mass-Action Kinetics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 32 |
| Book title |
Parallel Computing Technologies
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-39958-9_32 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-239957-2, 978-3-64-239958-9
|
| Authors |
Marco S. Nobile, Daniela Besozzi, Paolo Cazzaniga, Giancarlo Mauri, Dario Pescini, Nobile, Marco S., Besozzi, Daniela, Cazzaniga, Paolo, Mauri, Giancarlo, Pescini, Dario |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 38% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 25% |
| Engineering | 3 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,081,679
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,167
of 8,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,914
of 207,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#66
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.