↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Equations with Applications in Natural Sciences

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Weak Compactness Techniques and Coagulation Equations
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Weak Compactness Techniques and Coagulation Equations
Chapter number 5
Book title
Evolutionary Equations with Applications in Natural Sciences
Published in
arXiv, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11322-7_5
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-911321-0, 978-3-31-911322-7
Authors

Philippe Laurençot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2018.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#392,273
of 990,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,939
of 445,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#10,857
of 21,070 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21,070 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.