↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Clinical Science

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 159: RARβ Promoter Methylation as an Epigenetic Mechanism of Gene Silencing in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
RARβ Promoter Methylation as an Epigenetic Mechanism of Gene Silencing in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Chapter number 159
Book title
Advances in Clinical Science
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_159
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-921496-2, 978-3-31-921497-9
Authors

Dutkowska, A, Antczak, A, Pastuszak-Lewandoska, D, Migdalska-Sęk, M, Czarnecka, K H, Górski, P, Kordiak, J, Nawrot, E, Brzeziańska-Lasota, E, A. Dutkowska, A. Antczak, D. Pastuszak-Lewandoska, M. Migdalska-Sęk, K. H. Czarnecka, P. Górski, J. Kordiak, E. Nawrot, E. Brzeziańska-Lasota

Abstract

The retinoid acid receptor-β (RARβ) gene is one of the tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), which is frequently deleted or epigenetically silenced at an early stage of tumor progression. In this study we investigated the promoter methylation and expression status of the RARß gene in 60 surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissue samples and 60 corresponding unchanged lung tissue samples, using methylation-specific PCR and real-time-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) techniques. We correlated the results with the pathological features of tumors and clinical characteristics of patients. qPCR analysis detected a significantly lower RARß expression in the patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) and large cell carcinoma (LCC) than in those with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (AC vs. SCC, p = 0.032; AC and LCC vs. SCC, p = 0.013). Additionally, significantly lower expression of the RARß gene was revealed in the patients with non-squamous cell cancer with a history of smoking assessed as pack-years (PY <40 vs. PY ≥40, p = 0.045). Regarding RARß promoter methylation, we found significant differences in the methylation index in the SCC group when considering pTNM staging; with higher index values in T1a + T1b compared with T2a + T2b and T3 + T4 groups (p = 0.024). There was no correlation between the methylation status and expression level of the RARß gene, which suggests that other molecular mechanisms influence the RARß expression in NSCLC patients. In conclusion, different expression of the RARß gene in SCC and NSCC makes the RARß gene a valuable diagnostic marker for differentiating the NSCLC subtypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 44%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 89%
Psychology 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,294,248
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,970
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,714
of 278,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#36
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.