↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Care and Clinical Medicine

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 31: Indoor Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds in Children: Health Risk Assessment in the Context of Physiological Development
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Indoor Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds in Children: Health Risk Assessment in the Context of Physiological Development
Chapter number 31
Book title
Pulmonary Care and Clinical Medicine
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_31
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-965468-3, 978-3-31-965469-0
Authors

Radoslaw Czernych, Artur J. Badyda, Grazyna Gałęzowska, Lidia Wolska, Pawel Zagożdżon, Czernych, Radoslaw, Badyda, Artur J., Gałęzowska, Grazyna, Wolska, Lidia, Zagożdżon, Pawel

Abstract

Indoor air quality is strongly affected by the contamination of ambient air and that related to building and finishing materials and to human activity. Poor ventilation of closed spaces facilitates retention of greater quantity of pollutants. Infants and children are at particular risk of exposure to indoor air pollutants as they undergo rapid physiological and biochemical changes and demonstrate activity patterns unlike those in adults. Health risk assessment in children should be carried out with regard to children-specific factors, since these factors may constitute a source of errors. In this article we weigh up two different: Scenario 1 in which risk assessment was carried out in five age-groups (0-1, 2-3, 4-6, 7-11, and 12-16 years of age) and Scenario 2 encompassing only two age-groups (0-6 and 7-16 years of age). The findings indicate that data on carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects obtained by applying the second scenario were overestimated or averaged; either giving much reduced information that may lead to a false judgment on actual risk. This kind of fallacy is avoided when applying the age stratification into a greater number of groups for the health risk assessment in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Master 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,554,389
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,323
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,307
of 421,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.