↓ Skip to main content

Plant DNA Fingerprinting and Barcoding

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Plant DNA Fingerprinting and Barcoding'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Taxonomist’s View on Genomic Authentication
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 DNA Fingerprinting, DNA Barcoding, and Next Generation Sequencing Technology in Plants
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Challenges in the DNA Barcoding of Plant Material
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Plant Genetics for Forensic Applications
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 DNA Purification from Multiple Sources in Plant Research with Homemade Silica Resins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Random Amplified Marker Technique for Plants Rich in Polyphenols
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism: An Invaluable Fingerprinting Technique for Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Epigenetic Studies
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism of the 5S-rRNA-NTS Region: A Rapid and Precise Method for Plant Identification
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 ISSR: A Reliable and Cost-Effective Technique for Detection of DNA Polymorphism.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Development of Sequence Characterized Amplified Region from Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Amplicons
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Authentication of Medicinal Plants by SNP-Based Multiplex PCR
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Multiplex PCR Method to Discriminate Artemisia iwayomogi from Other Artemisia Plants
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for the Detection of Plant Pathogens
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Genomic DNA extraction and barcoding of endophytic fungi.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Using GenBank® for Genomic Authentication: A Tutorial
Attention for Chapter 3: Challenges in the DNA Barcoding of Plant Material
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Challenges in the DNA Barcoding of Plant Material
Chapter number 3
Book title
Plant DNA Fingerprinting and Barcoding
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-609-8_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-608-1, 978-1-61779-609-8
Authors

Robyn S. Cowan, Michael F. Fay

Abstract

DNA barcoding, using a short gene sequence from a standardized region of the genome, is a species identification tool which would not only aid species discovery but would also have applications ranging from large-scale biodiversity surveys through to identification of a single fragment of material in forensic contexts. To fulfill this vision a universal, relatively cheap, scalable system needs to be in place. The mitochondrial locus being used for many animal groups and algae is not suitable for use in land plants, and an appropriate alternative is needed.Progress has been made in the selection of two alternative regions for plant DNA barcoding. There are however many challenges in finding a solution that fulfills all the requirements of a successful, universally applicable barcode, and in the short term a pragmatic solution that achieves as much as possible and has payoffs in most areas has been chosen. Research continues in areas ranging from the technicalities of sequencing the regions to data analysis and the potential improvements that may result from the developing technology and data analysis systems.The ultimate success of DNA barcoding as a plant identification tool for all occasions depends on the building of a reference database and it fulfilling the requirements of potential users such that they are able to achieve valid results through its use, that would be more time consuming and costly, and less reliable using other techniques.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,402,296
of 4,300,992 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,759
of 2,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,653
of 115,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#40
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,300,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.