↓ Skip to main content

In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Mutagenesis Protocols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by In Vivo Overlap Extension
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 In Vitro Mutagenesis of Brucella Species
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Random Mutagenesis Strategies for Campylobacter and Helicobacter Species
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Mutagenesis of the Repeat Regions of Herpesviruses Cloned as Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 An Efficient Protocol for VZV BAC-Based Mutagenesis
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Method for Rapid Genetic Integration into Plasmodium falciparum Utilizing Mycobacteriophage Bxb1 Integrase
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A rapid and versatile PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis protocol for generation of mutations along the entire length of a cloned cDNA.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Rapid Sequence Scanning Mutagenesis Using In Silico Oligo Design and the Megaprimer PCR of Whole Plasmid Method (MegaWHOP)
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Insertion and Deletion Mutagenesis by Overlap Extension PCR
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Modified Inverse PCR Procedure for Insertion, Deletion, or Replacement of a DNA Fragment in a Target Sequence and Its Application in the Ligand Interaction Scan Method for Generation of Ligand-Regulated Proteins
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Amplification of Orthologous Genes Using Degenerate Primers
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational Evaluation of Protein Stability Change upon Mutations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Approaches for Using Animal Models to Identify Loci That Genetically Interact with Human Disease-Causing Point Mutations
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Using Peptide Loop Insertion Mutagenesis for the Evolution of Proteins
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Massive Mutagenesis ® : High-Throughput Combinatorial Site-Directed Mutagenesis
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Directed In Vitro Evolution of Reporter Genes Based on Semi-Rational Design and High-Throughput Screening
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Ribosome Display for Rapid Protein Evolution by Consecutive Rounds of Mutation and Selection
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Fine-Tuning Enzyme Activity Through Saturation Mutagenesis
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Characterization of Structural Determinants of Type 1 Corticotropin Releasing Hormone (CRH) Receptor Signalling Properties
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Improving Biophysical Properties of V H Domains
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Phenotype Based Functional Gene Screening Using Retrovirus-Mediated Gene Trapping in Quasi-Haploid RAW 264.7 Cells
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Site-Directed Disulfide Cross-Linking to Probe Conformational Changes of a Transporter During Its Functional Cycle: Escherichia coli AcrB Multidrug Exporter as an Example
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Site-Specific Incorporation of Extra Components into RNA by Transcription Using Unnatural Base Pair Systems
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Mutagen™: A Random Mutagenesis Method Providing a Complementary Diversity Generated by Human Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Random-Scanning Mutagenesis
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Easy Two-Step Method for Randomizing and Cloning Gene Fragments
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Random Mutagenesis Using a Mutator Strain
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 En Passant Mutagenesis: A Two Step Markerless Red Recombination System
Attention for Chapter 7: In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols
Chapter number 7
Book title
In Vitro Mutagenesis Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-652-8_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60761-651-1, 978-1-60761-652-8
Authors

McCullum, Elizabeth O, Williams, Berea A R, Zhang, Jinglei, Chaput, John C, Elizabeth O. McCullum, Berea A. R. Williams, Jinglei Zhang, John C. Chaput, McCullum, Elizabeth O., Williams, Berea A. R., Chaput, John C.

Abstract

In vitro selection coupled with directed evolution represents a powerful method for generating nucleic acids and proteins with desired functional properties. Creating high-quality libraries of random sequences is an important step in this process as it allows variants of individual molecules to be generated from a single-parent sequence. These libraries are then screened for individual molecules with interesting, and sometimes very rare, phenotypes. Here, we describe a general method to introduce random nucleotide mutations into a parent sequence that takes advantage of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This protocol reduces mutational bias often associated with error-prone PCR methods and allows the experimenter to control the degree of mutagenesis by controlling the number of gene-doubling events that occur in the PCR reaction. The error-prone PCR method described here was used to optimize a de novo evolved protein for improved folding stability, solubility, and ligand-binding affinity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 462 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 21%
Student > Bachelor 81 17%
Student > Master 60 13%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 48 10%
Unknown 107 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 168 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 20%
Chemistry 36 8%
Engineering 15 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Other 28 6%
Unknown 120 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,852,188
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#981
of 13,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,272
of 165,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#13
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.