↓ Skip to main content

Glaucoma

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Glaucoma'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Use of Animal Models and Techniques in Glaucoma Research: Introduction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Hypertonic Saline Injection Model of Experimental Glaucoma in Rats
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Microbead Occlusion Model of Ocular Hypertension in Mice
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Ocular Hypertension/Glaucoma in Minipigs: Episcleral Veins Cauterization and Microbead Occlusion Methods
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Noninvasive Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Animals Models of Glaucoma
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 High-Throughput Binocular Pattern Electroretinograms in the Mouse
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Visual Evoked Potentials in Glaucoma and Alzheimer’s Disease
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Investigation of the Functional Retinal Output Using Microelectrode Arrays
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Human Aqueous Humor Using iTRAQ 4plex Labeling
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Shotgun Sphingolipid Analysis of Human Aqueous Humor
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Assessment of Aqueous Humor Dynamics in the Rodent by Constant Flow Infusion
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Methods for Analyzing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Trabecular Meshwork of Glaucoma Models
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Quantification of Scleral Biomechanics and Collagen Fiber Alignment
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Biolistic Labeling of Retinal Ganglion Cells
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Anterograde Tract Tracing for Assaying Axonopathy and Transport Deficits in Glaucoma
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Studying Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Optic Nerve Regeneration
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 3D Histomorphometric Reconstruction and Quantification of the Optic Nerve Head Connective Tissues
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Visualizing Astrocytes of the Optic Nerve
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Investigation of MicroRNA Expression in Experimental Glaucoma
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Utilizing RNA-Seq to Identify Differentially Expressed Genes in Glaucoma Model Tissues, Such as the Rodent Optic Nerve Head
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Single-Cell Dissociation and Characterization in the Murine Retina and Optic Nerve
Attention for Chapter 9: Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Human Aqueous Humor Using iTRAQ 4plex Labeling
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Human Aqueous Humor Using iTRAQ 4plex Labeling
Chapter number 9
Book title
Glaucoma
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7407-8_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7406-1, 978-1-4939-7407-8
Authors

Anna Trzeciecka, Padmanabhan Pattabiraman, Maria Carmen Piqueras, Carol Toris, Sanjoy K. Bhattacharya, Trzeciecka, Anna, Pattabiraman, Padmanabhan, Piqueras, Maria Carmen, Toris, Carol, Bhattacharya, Sanjoy K.

Abstract

iTRAQ 4plex method enables multiplexing of up to four samples for simultaneous quantitation to improve sensitivity and scope of proteomic analysis. Here, we describe iTRAQ 4plex labeling of human aqueous humor specimens followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) and data analysis for peptide identification and quantitation using Proteome Discoverer software. The protocol can be applied for other animals as well; however, pooling of specimens may be required to obtain sufficient amount of protein for labeling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 3%
Professor 1 1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 1%
Researcher 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,992
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,621
of 442,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#950
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.