↓ Skip to main content

Caspases,Paracaspases, and Metacaspases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Preparation of Arabidopsis thaliana Seedling Proteomes for Identifying Metacaspase Substrates by N-terminal COFRADIC
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Preparation of Arabidopsis thaliana Seedling Proteomes for Identifying Metacaspase Substrates by N-terminal COFRADIC
Chapter number 16
Book title
Caspases,Paracaspases, and Metacaspases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0357-3_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0356-6, 978-1-4939-0357-3
Authors

Tsiatsiani, Liana, Stael, Simon, Van Damme, Petra, Van Breusegem, Frank, Gevaert, Kris, Liana Tsiatsiani, Simon Stael, Petra Van Damme, Frank Van Breusegem, Kris Gevaert, Damme, Petra, Breusegem, Frank

Abstract

Proteome-wide discovery of in vivo metacaspase substrates can be obtained by positional proteomics approaches such as N-terminal COFRADIC, for example by comparing the N-terminal proteomes (or N-terminomes) of wild-type plants to transgenic plants not expressing a given metacaspase. In this chapter we describe a protocol for the preparation of plant tissue proteomes, including differential isotopic labelling allowing for a comparison of in vivo N-terminomes that serves as the starting point for N-terminal COFRADIC studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,304,825
of 13,779,708 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,575
of 8,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,340
of 212,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#22
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,779,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.