↓ Skip to main content

Caspases,Paracaspases, and Metacaspases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Caspase Protocols in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Caspase Protocols in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Caspases,Paracaspases, and Metacaspases
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0357-3_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0356-6, 978-1-4939-0357-3
Authors

Lee ES, Xue D, Eui Seung Lee, Ding Xue, Lee, Eui Seung, Xue, Ding

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans genome has four genes (ced-3, csp-1, csp-2, and csp-3) encoding caspase-like proteins. Among these four proteins, CED-3 is the most well-known cell-killing caspase. Elucidation of the role of CED-3 as a central component of the apoptotic pathway in C. elegans has contributed to the understanding of the more complex apoptosis network in mammals and in other metazoa. In the highly conserved pathway of programmed cell death in C. elegans, CED-3 functions at the terminal step of this cell-killing pathway. Identification of CED-3 caspase substrates is essential for bridging the gaps between CED-3 activation and various downstream cell death execution events. If a protein is cleaved by CED-3 in vitro, this protein could be a potential CED-3 substrate in vivo. Here, we describe the method for purification of active CED-3 caspase. We will also describe in vitro assays for determining CED-3 proteolytic activity, CED-3 substrates, and CED-3 cleavage sites in the substrates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,239,689
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,844
of 221,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#84
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.