↓ Skip to main content

Tumor-infiltrating B cells: their role and application in anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Immunology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
346 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor-infiltrating B cells: their role and application in anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Immunology, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41423-018-0027-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Si-si Wang, Wei Liu, Dalam Ly, Hao Xu, Limei Qu, Li Zhang

Abstract

Evidence indicates that lung cancer development is a complex process that involves interactions between tumor cells, stromal fibroblasts, and immune cells. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells play a significant role in the promotion or inhibition of tumor growth. As an integral component of the tumor microenvironment, tumor-infiltrating B lymphocytes (TIBs) exist in all stages of cancer and play important roles in shaping tumor development. Here, we review recent clinical and preclinical studies that outline the role of TIBs in lung cancer development, assess their prognostic significance, and explore the potential benefit of B cell-based immunotherapy for lung cancer treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 277 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Student > Master 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 86 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 49 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 94 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,004,326
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Immunology
#559
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,153
of 329,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Immunology
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.