↓ Skip to main content

Pain Control

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: The role of glia in the spinal cord in neuropathic and inflammatory pain.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The role of glia in the spinal cord in neuropathic and inflammatory pain.
Chapter number 8
Book title
Pain Control
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-66-246449-6, 978-3-66-246450-2
Authors

Old, Elizabeth Amy, Clark, Anna K, Malcangio, Marzia, Elizabeth Amy Old, Anna K. Clark, Marzia Malcangio, Clark, Anna K.

Abstract

Chronic pain, both inflammatory and neuropathic, is a debilitating condition in which the pain experience persists after the painful stimulus has resolved. The efficacy of current treatment strategies using opioids, NSAIDS and anticonvulsants is limited by the extensive side effects observed in patients, underlining the necessity for novel therapeutic targets. Preclinical models of chronic pain have recently provided evidence for a critical role played by glial cells in the mechanisms underlying the chronicity of pain, both at the site of damage in the periphery and in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Here microglia and astrocytes respond to the increased input from the periphery and change morphology, increase in number and release pro-nociceptive mediators such as ATP, cytokines and chemokines. These gliotransmitters can sensitise neurons by activation of their cognate receptors thereby contributing to central sensitization which is fundamental for the generation of allodynia, hyperalgesia and spontaneous pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#569
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,802
of 353,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#59
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.