↓ Skip to main content

Endocrine FGFs and Klothos

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Physiology of FGF15/19.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Physiology of FGF15/19.
Chapter number 11
Book title
Endocrine FGFs and Klothos
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0887-1_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-0886-4, 978-1-4614-0887-1
Authors

Stacey A. Jones, Jones, Stacey A.

Abstract

This chapter will review the various biological actions of the mouse fibroblast growth factor 15 (Fgf15) and human fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19). Unlike other members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family, the Fgf15 and FGF19 orthologs do not share a high degree of sequence identity. Fgf15 and FGF19 are members of an atypical subfamily of FGFs that function as hormones. Due to subtle changes in tertiary structure, these FGFs have low heparin binding affinity enabling them to diffuse away from their site of secretion and signal to distant cells. FGF signaling through the FGF receptors is also different for this sub-family, requiring klotho protein cofactors rather than heparin sulfate proteoglycan. Mouse Fgf15 and human FGF19 play key roles in enterohepatic signaling, regulation of liver bile acid biosynthesis, gallbladder motility and metabolic homeostasis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 8 19%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,479
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,226
of 4,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,548
of 396,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#121
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.