↓ Skip to main content

Allergy and Respiration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 247: The Role of Ion Channels to Regulate Airway Ciliary Beat Frequency During Allergic Inflammation
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of Ion Channels to Regulate Airway Ciliary Beat Frequency During Allergic Inflammation
Chapter number 247
Book title
Allergy and Respiration
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_247
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942003-5, 978-3-31-942004-2
Authors

Joskova, Marta, Sutovska, M, Durdik, P, Koniar, D, Hargas, L, Banovcin, P, Hrianka, M, Khazaei, V, Pappova, L, Franova, S, M. Joskova, M. Sutovska, P. Durdik, D. Koniar, L. Hargas, P. Banovcin, M. Hrianka, V. Khazaei, L. Pappova, S. Franova, Joskova, M., Sutovska, M., Durdik, P., Koniar, D., Hargas, L., Banovcin, P., Hrianka, M., Khazaei, V., Pappova, L., Franova, S.

Abstract

Overproduction of mucus is a hallmark of asthma. The aim of this study was to identify potentially effective therapies for removing excess mucus. The role of voltage-gated (Kir 6.1, KCa 1.1) and store-operated ion channels (SOC, CRAC) in respiratory cilia, relating to the tracheal ciliary beat frequency (CBF), was compared under the physiological and allergic airway conditions. Ex vivo experiments were designed to test the local effects of Kir 6.1, KCa 1.1 and CRAC ion channel modulators in a concentration-dependent manner on the CBF. Cilia, obtained with the brushing method, were monitored by a high-speed video camera and analyzed with ciliary analysis software. In natural conditions, a Kir 6.1 opener accelerated CBF, while CRAC blocker slowed it in a concentration-dependent manner. In allergic inflammation, the effect of Kir 6.1 opener was insignificant, with a tendency to decrease CBF. A cilio-inhibitory effect of a CRAC blocker, while gently reduced by allergic inflammation, remained significant. A KCa 1.1 opener turned out to significantly enhance the CBF under the allergic OVA-sensitized conditions. We conclude that optimally attuned concentration of KCa 1.1 openers or special types of bimodal SOC channel blockers, potentially given by inhalation, might benefit asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 50%
Unspecified 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,379,760
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,507
of 4,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,300
of 350,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#32
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.