You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Plant Cytogenetics
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 7 |
Book title |
Plant Cytogenetics
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3622-9_7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3620-5, 978-1-4939-3622-9
|
Authors |
Lukaszewski, Adam J, Adam J. Lukaszewski, Lukaszewski, Adam J. |
Abstract |
Given the sizes of the three genomes in wheat (A, B, and D) and a limited number of chiasmata formed in meiosis, recombination by crossing-over is a very rare event. It is also restricted to very similar homologues; the pairing homoeologous (Ph) system of wheat prevents differentiated chromosomes from pairing and crossing-over. This chapter presents an overview and describes several systems by which the frequency or density of crossing-over can be increased, both in homologues and homoeologues. It also presents the standard system of E.R. Sears for engineering alien chromosome transfers into wheat. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,858,030
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,701
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,012
of 393,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#469
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.