↓ Skip to main content

Body Metabolism and Exercise

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 19: Nutritional Status in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Systemic Sclerosis: Two Systemic Diseases Involving the Respiratory System.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nutritional Status in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Systemic Sclerosis: Two Systemic Diseases Involving the Respiratory System.
Chapter number 19
Book title
Body Metabolism and Exercise
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/5584_2014_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-910249-8, 978-3-31-910250-4
Authors

D Mękal, A Doboszyńska, E Kądalska, E Swietlik, L Rudnicka, D. Mękal, A. Doboszyńska, E. Kądalska, E. Świetlik, L. Rudnicka, Mękal, D., Doboszyńska, A., Kądalska, E., Świetlik, E., Rudnicka, L.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess and compare the nutritional status and life quality of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Thirty patients with stable COPD and 32 patients with SSc were examined. In all patients, the following parameters were measured: fat mass, fat-free mass, total body water, FEV1, and blood gases. COPD patients' life quality was assessed with St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, and in SSc patients with a Quality of Life Questionnaire. The results show that among COPD patients 13 % had normal body weight, 60 % were obese, and 27 % were overweight. In SSc patients, 59 % had normal body weight, 31 % were overweight, 1 patient was obese, and 2 were underweight. The mean life quality score in COPD patients was 57.3 ± 16.5, while that in SSc patients was 35.8 ± 18.2. COPD patients had a statistically significant lower life quality than SSc patients. The mean value of FEV1 was 45.5 ± 12.2 % pred. in COPD patients, and 86.8 ± 21.2 % pred. in the SSc group. We conclude that nutritional disorders are more frequent in COPD patients compared to those with SSc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Unspecified 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,239,689
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,954
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,524
of 255,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#64
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.