↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Retirement preparation program: evaluation of results

Overview of attention for article published in Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Retirement preparation program: evaluation of results
Published in
Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41155-018-0091-2

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#10,210,411
of 12,781,938 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#155
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,990
of 274,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,781,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them