↓ Skip to main content

Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and no history of stroke or transient ischemic attacks
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006186.pub2
Authors

Maria I Aguilar, Robert Hart, Lesly A Pearce

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 147 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Other 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 18 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2009.
All research outputs
#3,453,666
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,024
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,951
of 277,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.