↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: Psychoneuroimmunology and Natural Killer Cells: The Chromium-Release Whole-Blood Assay
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Psychoneuroimmunology and Natural Killer Cells: The Chromium-Release Whole-Blood Assay
Chapter number 12
Book title
Psychoneuroimmunology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7828-1_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7827-4, 978-1-4939-7828-1
Authors

Mary Ann Fletcher, Zachary Barnes, Gordon Broderick, Nancy G. Klimas, Fletcher, Mary Ann, Barnes, Zachary, Broderick, Gordon, Klimas, Nancy G.

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are an essential component of innate immunity. These lymphocytes are also sensitive barometers of the effects of endogenous and exogenous stressors on the immune system. This chapter describes a chromium (51Cr)-release bioassay designed to measure to the target cell killing capacity of NK cells (NKCC). Key features of the cytotoxicity assay are that it is done with whole blood and that numbers of effector cells are determined for each sample by flow cytometry and lymphocyte count. Effector cells are defined as CD3-CD56+ lymphocytes. Target cells are the K562 erythroleukemia cell line. Killing capacity is defined as number of target cells killed per effector cell, at an effector cell/target cell ratio of 1:1 during a 4-h in vitro assay.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#12,882,417
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,239
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,019
of 442,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#270
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.