↓ Skip to main content

Salmonella

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Salmonella'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Luminex® Multiplex Bead Suspension Arrays for the Detection and Serotyping of Salmonella spp.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Quantitative Proteomic Identification of Host Factors Involved in the Salmonella typhimurium Infection Cycle
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Determination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Salmonella spp.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Salmonella
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Method to Introduce an Internal Tag Sequence into a Salmonella Chromosomal Gene
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Salmonella
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Detection of Antimicrobial (Poly)Peptides with Acid Urea Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Followed by Western Immunoblot
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detecting Non-typhoid Salmonella in Humans by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs): Practical and Epidemiological Aspects
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Study of the Stn Protein in Salmonella ; A Regulator of Membrane Composition and Integrity
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Development of a Bacterial Nanoparticle Vaccine
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Direct Attachment of Nanoparticle Cargo to Salmonella typhimurium Membranes Designed for Combination Bacteriotherapy Against Tumors
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Applications of Microscopy in Salmonella Research
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Live Cell Imaging of Intracellular Salmonella enterica
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 In Vitro Modeling of Gallbladder-Associated Salmonella spp. Colonization.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Salmonella phages and prophages: genomics, taxonomy, and applied aspects.
Attention for Chapter 1: Luminex® Multiplex Bead Suspension Arrays for the Detection and Serotyping of Salmonella spp.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Luminex® Multiplex Bead Suspension Arrays for the Detection and Serotyping of Salmonella spp.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Salmonella
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1625-2_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1624-5, 978-1-4939-1625-2
Authors

Dunbar SA, Ritchie VB, Hoffmeyer MR, Rana GS, Zhang H, Sherry A. Dunbar, Vivette Brown Ritchie, Michaela R. Hoffmeyer, Gunjot S. Rana, Hongwei Zhang

Abstract

In this chapter we describe two commercially available bead-based molecular assays for detection, identification and serotyping of Salmonella. The xTAG(®) Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel (GPP) is a qualitative multiplex test for the simultaneous detection of nucleic acids from Salmonella plus 14 other gastroenteritis-causing bacteria, viruses, and parasites from stool specimens. xTAG GPP uses the Luminex(®) xTAG universal array technology for the identification of specific target sequences combined with the xMAP(®) bead multiplexing platform for detection of the targets that were present in the starting sample. The xMAP Salmonella Serotyping Assay (SSA) is a multiplex nucleic acid-based direct hybridization assay for molecular identification of the serotype of Salmonella isolates. In xMAP SSA, target sequences amplified from cultured Salmonella isolates are captured by hybridization to sequence-specific capture probes which have been coupled to the multiplexed bead sets. Herein we provide detailed protocols for each of these assays and present data which describe their performance characteristics for detection and serotyping Salmonella.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Other 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,406,536
of 14,668,794 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,767
of 8,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,018
of 211,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#7
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,668,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.