↓ Skip to main content

Fc Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Fc Receptors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Old but New IgM Fc Receptor (Fc μ R)
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Emerging Roles for the FCRL Family Members in Lymphocyte Biology and Disease.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Intracellular Antibody Immunity and the Cytosolic Fc Receptor TRIM21.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Computational Modeling of the Main Signaling Pathways Involved in Mast Cell Activation
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Calcium Channels in Fc Receptor Signaling
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Regulation of FcεRI Signaling by Lipid Phosphatases.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Fc receptors as adaptive immunoreceptors.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Glycosylation and fc receptors.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Antibodies as Natural Adjuvants
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 IgA, IgA Receptors, and Their Anti-inflammatory Properties.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Humanized Mice to Study FcγR Function.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 FcRn: From Molecular Interactions to Regulation of IgG Pharmacokinetics and Functions.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Human FcR Polymorphism and Disease
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Bridging autoantibodies and arthritis: the role of fc receptors.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The FcγR of Humans and Non-human Primates and Their Interaction with IgG: Implications for Induction of Inflammation, Resistance to Infection and the Use of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 FcγRIIB as a Key Determinant of Agonistic Antibody Efficacy.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Fc receptor-dependent mechanisms of monoclonal antibody therapy of cancer.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Sweet and Sour: The Role of Glycosylation for the Anti-inflammatory Activity of Immunoglobulin G.
Attention for Chapter 16: FcγRIIB as a Key Determinant of Agonistic Antibody Efficacy.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
FcγRIIB as a Key Determinant of Agonistic Antibody Efficacy.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Fc Receptors
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07911-0_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-907910-3, 978-3-31-907911-0
Authors

Ann L. White, Stephen A. Beers, Mark S. Cragg, White AL, Beers SA, Cragg MS, White, Ann L., Beers, Stephen A., Cragg, Mark S.

Abstract

Fc gamma Receptor (FcγR) IIB (CD32B) is an immunoreceptor tyrosine inhibitory motif (ITIM)-bearing Fc receptor that is involved in abrogating the signalling and function delivered from other receptors; archetypally those arising from other, activatory, FcγR and from the B cell receptor (BCR) for antigen. In the context of immunotherapy, it has convincingly been shown to limit a variety of clinically important therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as rituximab and trastuzumab in preclinical models. However, recent exploration of so-called immunomodulatory mAb, for example agonist mAb directed against various members of the TNFR super-family, has cast new light on the ability of FcγRIIB to regulate immune responses and immunotherapy. These data, accumulated by several independent groups, have shown the seemingly paradoxical ability of FcγRIIB to augment or even be absolutely required for the activity of this class of mAb. In this review we highlight the key role of FcγRIIB in regulating agonistic mAb, detail the likely mechanism of action and propose new ways in which this information may be exploited therapeutically.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,323,874
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#539
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,235
of 311,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.