↓ Skip to main content

T-Helper Cells

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'T-Helper Cells'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Isolation of T Cells from the Skin
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Isolation of Leukocytes from Mouse Central Nervous System
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation of T Cells from the Gut
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 T Cell Isolation from Mouse Kidneys
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Intracellular Staining for Cytokines and Transcription Factors
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Tracking Cells and Monitoring Proliferation
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Mass cytometry analysis of human T cell phenotype and function.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detection of NF-κB Pathway Activation in T Helper Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Assessing the suppressive activity of foxp3(+) regulatory T cells.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In vitro generation of microbe-specific human th17 cells.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Vitro Polarization of T-Helper Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Method for the Generation of TCR Retrogenic Mice
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Mouse models of allergic airway disease.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Induction of Colitis in Mice (T-Cell Transfer Model)
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Manipulation of T Cell Function and Conditional Gene Targeting in T Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Aldara-induced psoriasis-like skin inflammation: isolation and characterization of cutaneous dendritic cells and innate lymphocytes.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Induction of Passive EAE Using Myelin-Reactive CD4+ T Cells
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Experimental mouse models of T cell-dependent inflammatory bowel disease.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Analysis of Chromosomal Aberrations in Murine HCC
Attention for Chapter 18: Experimental mouse models of T cell-dependent inflammatory bowel disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Experimental mouse models of T cell-dependent inflammatory bowel disease.
Chapter number 18
Book title
T-Helper Cells
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1212-4_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1211-7, 978-1-4939-1212-4
Authors

Song-Zhao GX, Maloy KJ, George X. Song-Zhao, Kevin J. Maloy

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent idiopathic chronic inflammatory disorders of the intestinal tract that are associated with aberrant immune responses against intestinal bacteria. Here, we describe two T cell-dependent models of experimental murine IBD. In the "T cell transfer" model, lymphopenic (scid or Rag (-/-) ) mice develop colitis upon adoptive transfer of naïve CD4(+) T cells. This model has also been extensively employed to identify mechanisms through which CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells suppress intestinal inflammation in vivo. We also describe a model of T cell-dependent IBD in immunocompetent mice, induced by infection with the intestinal bacterium Helicobacter hepaticus and concomitant treatment with a blocking αIL-10R mAb, which leads to the development of chronic inflammation of the caecum and colon (typhlocolitis). Both models reproduce many facets of human IBD pathology, including epithelial hyperplasia, goblet cell depletion, and leukocyte infiltration. These models provide reliable and tractable systems for the analyses of the induction and regulation of chronic inflammation in the gut.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 28%
Professor 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 11 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,870
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,400
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#40
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.