↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 26: Designing and Assembling Plasmids for the Construction of Escherichia coli Biosensor for Vibrio cholerae Detection
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Designing and Assembling Plasmids for the Construction of Escherichia coli Biosensor for Vibrio cholerae Detection
Chapter number 26
Book title
Synthetic Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7795-6_26
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7794-9, 978-1-4939-7795-6
Authors

Holowko, Maciej B, Poh, Chueh Loo, Maciej B. Holowko, Chueh Loo Poh

Abstract

In the process of constructing and characterizing the whole cell biosensor for Vibrio cholerae detection, two main techniques have been employed-DNA assembly using the Gibson isothermal assembly reaction was used for the assembly of the PCRed plasmid fragments (DNA parts), and microplate fluorescence readings were used for bacterial strain characterization. The general workflow can be summed up as: the in silico designed DNA fragments were assembled by isothermal assembly to be later transformed into Escherichia coli that, in turn, was characterized using the microplate reader. As fine-tuning of the sensor design was required, the process was repeated iteratively until the final strain was created with desired characteristics. This chapter describes in detail this workflow for different constructs which finally led to the creation of the first whole cell biosensor in E. coli for V. cholerae detection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,564,403
of 23,393,513 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,581
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,245
of 444,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#332
of 1,496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.