↓ Skip to main content

Choosing and Using a Refracting Telescope

Overview of attention for book
Choosing and Using a Refracting Telescope
Springer New York
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing and Using a Refracting Telescope
Published by
ADS, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6403-8
ISBNs
978-1-4419-6402-1, 978-1-4419-6403-8
Authors

Neil English

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,687,892
of 15,055,070 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,116
of 29,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,071
of 278,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#47
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,055,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.