Christian Grove, Scott Cain, Wen J. Chen, Paul Davis, Todd Harris, Kevin L. Howe, Ranjana Kishore, Raymond Lee, Michael Paulini, Daniela Raciti, Mary Ann Tuli, Kimberly Van Auken, Gary Williams, The WormBase Consortium, Grove, Christian, Cain, Scott, Chen, Wen J., Davis, Paul, Harris, Todd, Howe, Kevin L., Kishore, Ranjana, Lee, Raymond, Paulini, Michael, Raciti, Daniela, Tuli, Mary Ann, Auken, Kimberly, Williams, Gary, Auken, Kimberly Van
Abstract
WormBase ( www.wormbase.org ) provides the nematode research community with a centralized database for information pertaining to nematode genes and genomes. As more nematode genome sequences are becoming available and as richer data sets are published, WormBase strives to maintain updated information, displays, and services to facilitate efficient access to and understanding of the knowledge generated by the published nematode genetics literature. This chapter aims to provide an explanation of how to use basic features of WormBase, new features, and some commonly used tools and data queries. Explanations of the curated data and step-by-step instructions of how to access the data via the WormBase website and available data mining tools are provided.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,919,552
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,551
of 13,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,078
of 450,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#296
of 1,482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
