You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
| Chapter title |
Serotype Assignment by Sero-Agglutination, ELISA, and PCR
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Listeria monocytogenes
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-0703-8_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-0702-1, 978-1-4939-0703-8
|
| Authors |
Lisa Gorski |
| Abstract |
For assessing isolates of Listeria monocytogenes serotype designation is the foremost subtyping method used. Traditionally, serotyping has been done with agglutination reactions. In the last decade, alternative serotyping methods were described using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Herein are described the three methods, and the advantages and disadvantages of each. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |