↓ Skip to main content

Retinal and choroidal changes in steroid-associated central serous chorioretinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retinal and choroidal changes in steroid-associated central serous chorioretinopathy
Published in
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous , April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40942-018-0115-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikas Ambiya, Abhilash Goud, Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, Sankeert Gangakhedkar, Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina, Jay Chhablani

Abstract

To evaluate the retinal and choroidal alterations in steroid-associated central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) in comparison to idiopathic CSC. In this retrospective cohort study, swept source optical coherence tomography scans of eyes with steroid-associated CSC (group A) were compared with the same in idiopathic CSC (group B). The key features included central subfield retinal thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness, subfoveal large choroidal vessel diameter, subretinal deposits, retinal pigment epithelial irregularities, double layer sign, hyperreflective dots, intraretinal fluid, and choroidal vascularity index (ratio of choroidal luminal area and total choroidal area, measured on a high definition horizontal 9 mm OCT B-scan. There were 20 eyes in group A and 30 in group B. Group A had a higher female proportion (60 vs. 16.67%;P < 0.01) and higher bilaterality (30 vs. 6.67%;P = 0.03). The height of neurosensory detachment was lower in group A (153.1 ± 175.70 µm vs. 312.9 ± 223.06 µm;P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of subretinal deposits, retinal pigment epithelial irregularities, pigment epithelial detachments, double layer sign, outer retinal layer disruption, and intraretinal fluid. Hyperreflective dots (HRDs) were less common in group A (15 vs. 46.67%;P = 0.03). The subfoveal choroidal thickness (P = 0.65) and subfoveal large choroidal vessel diameter (P = 0.78) were comparable. There was a trend towards a higher choroidal vascularity index (CVI) in group A (A: mean, 82%, 95% CI, 66-99%; B: mean, 58%, 95% CI, 57-59%;P = 0.10). Steroid-associated CSC has a marginally higher CVI and less common association with HRDs as compared to idiopathic CSC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#155
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,654
of 342,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.