↓ Skip to main content

GeNeDis 2016

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'GeNeDis 2016'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Mobile Applications Improve Quality of Life on Citizens with Disorientation: The ‘NeverLost App’ Paradigm
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Performance Management in Healthcare Organizations: Concept and Practicum
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Musculoskeletal Problems Among Greek Perioperative Nurses in Regional Hospitals in Southern Peloponnese
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Exploring the Notion of Context in Medical Data
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 vhMentor: An Ontology Supported Mobile Agent System for Pervasive Health Care Monitoring
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Internet Addiction of Young Greek Adults: Psychological Aspects and Information Privacy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A DICOM Based Collaborative Platform for Real-Time Medical Teleconsultation on Medical Images
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Exploring Amyloidogenicity of Clusterin: A Structural and Bioinformatics Analysis
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Applications for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) and Electrical Properties of the Human Body
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Application of Theranostics in Oncology
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Sport Participation and Ageing: Evidence from Marathon Events
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 IoT Applications with 5G Connectivity in Medical Tourism Sector Management: Third-Party Service Scenarios
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Recognizing Emotional States Using Speech Information
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Real Time 3D Representation and Tracking of Guidewire for Image Guided Cardiovascular Interventions
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Utilizing a Homecare Platform for Remote Monitoring of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 IoT Contextual Factors on Healthcare
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Methods and Patterns for User-Friendly Quantum Programming
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Bullying in Virtual Learning Communities
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Programmatic Assessment of Professionalism in Psychiatry Education: A Literature Review and Implementation Guide
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Opinion Mining for Educational Video Lectures
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Cognitive Enhancement Using ICT and Its Ethical Implications
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Smart Health Caring Home: A Systematic Review of Smart Home Care for Elders and Chronic Disease Patients
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 SSEv: A New Small Samples Evaluator Based on Modified Survival Curves
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Efficient Health Information Management Based on Patient-Generated Digital Data
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Long-Term Survival of Women with Breast Cancer. Overview Supportive Care Needs Assessment Instruments.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Safe Use of Defibrillators: A Case Study in Greek Registered Nurses
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Quality of Life in Elderly Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Quality of Life in Elderly Bladder Cancer Patients Following a Cystectomy
Attention for Chapter 19: Programmatic Assessment of Professionalism in Psychiatry Education: A Literature Review and Implementation Guide
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Programmatic Assessment of Professionalism in Psychiatry Education: A Literature Review and Implementation Guide
Chapter number 19
Book title
GeNeDis 2016
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-957347-2, 978-3-31-957348-9
Authors

Plakiotis, Christos, Christos Plakiotis

Abstract

Programmatic assessment is being adopted as a preferred method of assessment in postgraduate medical education in Australia. Programmatic assessment of professionalism is likely to receive increasing attention. This paper reviews the literature regarding the assessment of professionalism in psychiatry. A search using the terms 'professionalism AND psychiatry' was conducted in the ERIC database. Only original articles relevant to professionalism education and assessment in psychiatry were selected, rather than theoretical or review papers that applied research from other fields of medicine to psychiatry. Articles regarding the need for professionalism education in psychiatry were included as they provided a rationale for curriculum development in this field as a precursor to assessment. Key findings from the literature were summarised in light of the author's own experience as an educator and assessor of both medical students and trainees in psychiatry, and incorporated into a guide to implementing programmatic assessment of professionalism in psychiatry. Within psychiatry, the specific evidence base for use of particular tools in assessing professionalism is limited. However, used in conjunction with psychiatrists' views about what is important in professionalism education, as well as knowledge from other medical disciplines regarding professionalism assessment tools, this evidence can inform implementation of programmatic assessment of professionalism in undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing professional development settings. Given the emergent nature of such assessment initiatives, they should be subjected to rigorous evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 14 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,440,927
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,607
of 5,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,468
of 328,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.