↓ Skip to main content

Digital PCR

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Digital PCR'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Entering the Pantheon of 21 st Century Molecular Biology Tools: A Perspective on Digital PCR
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Basic Concepts and Validation of Digital PCR Measurements
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Fundamentals of Counting Statistics in Digital PCR: I Just Measured Two Target Copies–What Does It Mean?
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Control Materials and Digital PCR Methods for Evaluation of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Extractions from Plasma
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Protocols for Quantification of GM Maize Events
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Using Droplet Digital PCR to Detect Coinfection of Human Herpesviruses 6A and 6B (HHV-6A and HHV-6B) in Clinical Samples
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Biomarkers in Cerebrospinal Fluid: Analysis of Cell-Free Circulating Mitochondrial DNA by Digital PCR
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Testing of General and Human-Associated Fecal Contamination in Waters
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Analyzing Copy Number Variation with Droplet Digital PCR
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Assessing HER2 Amplification in Plasma cfDNA
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Detection and Quantification of Mosaic Genomic DNA Variation in Primary Somatic Tissues Using ddPCR: Analysis of Mosaic Transposable-Element Insertions, Copy-Number Variants, and Single-Nucleotide Variants
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Monitoring of Response and Resistance in Plasma of EGFR -Mutant Lung Cancer Using Droplet Digital PCR
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Detection of Cancer DNA in Early Stage and Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Droplet Digital PCR for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Mature Lymphoproliferative Disorders
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Quantitation of JAK2 V617F Allele Burden by Using the QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR System
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Novel Multiplexing Strategies for Quantification of Rare Alleles Using ddPCR
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identification and Use of Personalized Genomic Markers for Monitoring Circulating Tumor DNA
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Single Color Multiplexed ddPCR Copy Number Measurements and Single Nucleotide Variant Genotyping
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 A Universal Droplet Digital PCR Approach for Monitoring of Graft Health After Transplantation Using a Preselected SNP Set
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Detection and Quantification of HDR and NHEJ Induced by Genome Editing at Endogenous Gene Loci Using Droplet Digital PCR
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 DNA Methylation Analysis Using Droplet Digital PCR
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Simultaneous Quantification of Multiple Alternatively Spliced mRNA Transcripts Using Droplet Digital PCR
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Using Droplet Digital PCR to Analyze Allele-Specific RNA Expression
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Very Low Abundance Single-Cell Transcript Quantification with 5-Plex ddPCRTM Assays
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Quantification of Circulating MicroRNAs by Droplet Digital PCR
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Droplet Digital PCR for Absolute Quantification of Extracellular MicroRNAs in Plasma and Serum: Quantification of the Cancer Biomarker hsa-miR-141
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Droplet Digital™ PCR Next-Generation Sequencing Library QC Assay
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Phasing DNA Markers Using Digital PCR
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 ddTRAP: A Method for Sensitive and Precise Quantification of Telomerase Activity
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Highly Efficient and Reliable DNA Aptamer Selection Using the Partitioning Capabilities of ddPCR: The Hi-Fi SELEX Method
Attention for Chapter 8: Testing of General and Human-Associated Fecal Contamination in Waters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Testing of General and Human-Associated Fecal Contamination in Waters
Chapter number 8
Book title
Digital PCR
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7778-9_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7776-5, 978-1-4939-7778-9
Authors

Yiping Cao, Meredith R. Raith, John F. Griffith, Cao, Yiping, Raith, Meredith R., Griffith, John F.

Abstract

qPCR has become increasingly popular for microbial water quality testing because it is faster, more specific, and more flexible than culture-based methods. However, qPCR method limitations such as quantification bias introduced by reliance on standards and susceptibility to PCR inhibitors are major obstacles for implementation in water testing. This is because water testing requires accurate quantification of rare targets and because environmental waters often contain PCR inhibitors. Digital PCR offers the opportunity to maintain qPCR's advantages over culture-based methods while ameliorating two of qPCR's major limitations: the necessity to run standard curves and high susceptibility to inhibition. Here we describe a complete method for simultaneous testing for a general microbial water quality indicator (Enterococcus spp.) and a human-associated fecal marker in environmental waters. The complete method includes water sampling and filtration to capture bacteria, DNA extraction from bacteria captured on the filter, and droplet digital PCR to quantify the genetic markers from bacteria indicative of general and human-associated fecal contamination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 44%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 56%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,365,124
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,899
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,787
of 442,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#172
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.