↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by bronchial brush and immunocytochemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Cytopathology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary well-differentiated fetal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by bronchial brush and immunocytochemistry
Published in
Diagnostic Cytopathology, January 2006
DOI 10.1002/dc.20409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danilo N. Odashiro, Gia-Khanh Nguyen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,483,860
of 12,179,547 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Cytopathology
#133
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,470
of 277,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Cytopathology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,179,547 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.