↓ Skip to main content

What Should Be the Surgeon’s Role in Defining “Normal ” Genital Appearance?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Should Be the Surgeon’s Role in Defining “Normal ” Genital Appearance?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, April 2018
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.4.msoc4-1804
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devan Stahl, Christian J Vercler

Abstract

The recent rise in women seeking cosmetic surgery of their genitalia (labiaplasty) coincides with the increasing number of surgeons posting videos of these operations on social media accounts and websites. Sociocultural influences significantly contribute to our ideas of what constitutes healthy and pathologic, and surgeons have historically played a role in defining "normal" and "abnormal" anatomy. In the nineteenth century, Saartjie Baartman-a woman with a large posterior and unusually long labia minora-was used by physicians to "educate" the public about these differences. We examine the parallels with the twenty-first century practice of surgeons using social media to educate patients about the operations they perform and discuss ethical and professional hazards associated with this practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 50%
Psychology 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%