↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual biology, hypothesis discovery, and text mining: Swanson's legacy

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Digital Libraries, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
connotea
7 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conceptual biology, hypothesis discovery, and text mining: Swanson's legacy
Published in
Biomedical Digital Libraries, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-5581-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanja Bekhuis

Abstract

Innovative biomedical librarians and information specialists who want to expand their roles as expert searchers need to know about profound changes in biology and parallel trends in text mining. In recent years, conceptual biology has emerged as a complement to empirical biology. This is partly in response to the availability of massive digital resources such as the network of databases for molecular biologists at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Developments in text mining and hypothesis discovery systems based on the early work of Swanson, a mathematician and information scientist, are coincident with the emergence of conceptual biology. Very little has been written to introduce biomedical digital librarians to these new trends. In this paper, background for data and text mining, as well as for knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) and in text (KDT) is presented, then a brief review of Swanson's ideas, followed by a discussion of recent approaches to hypothesis discovery and testing. 'Testing' in the context of text mining involves partially automated methods for finding evidence in the literature to support hypothetical relationships. Concluding remarks follow regarding (a) the limits of current strategies for evaluation of hypothesis discovery systems and (b) the role of literature-based discovery in concert with empirical research. Report of an informatics-driven literature review for biomarkers of systemic lupus erythematosus is mentioned. Swanson's vision of the hidden value in the literature of science and, by extension, in biomedical digital databases, is still remarkably generative for information scientists, biologists, and physicians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 9%
Mexico 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Slovenia 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 79 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Professor 10 10%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 27 26%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 35 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,192,324
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Digital Libraries
#3
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,983
of 66,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Digital Libraries
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them