↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs and their target gene networks in breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
375 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNAs and their target gene networks in breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/bcr2484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth O'Day, Ashish Lal

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a major class of small endogenous RNA molecules that post-transcriptionally inhibit gene expression. Many miRNAs have been implicated in several human cancers, including breast cancer. Here we describe the association between altered miRNA signatures and breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis. The loss of several tumor suppressor miRNAs (miR-206, miR-17-5p, miR-125a, miR-125b, miR-200, let-7, miR-34 and miR-31) and the overexpression of certain oncogenic miRNAs (miR-21, miR-155, miR-10b, miR-373 and miR-520c) have been observed in many breast cancers. The gene networks orchestrated by these miRNAs are still largely unknown, although key targets have been identified that may contribute to the disease phenotype. Here we report how the observed perturbations in miRNA expression profiles may lead to disruption of key pathways involved in breast cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 348 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 24%
Researcher 75 20%
Student > Master 59 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 36 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 72 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 46 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#643
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,536
of 103,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.