↓ Skip to main content

Experimental design and statistical rigor in phylogenomics of horizontal and endosymbiotic gene transfer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental design and statistical rigor in phylogenomics of horizontal and endosymbiotic gene transfer
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-259
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Stiller

Abstract

A growing number of phylogenomic investigations from diverse eukaryotes are examining conflicts among gene trees as evidence of horizontal gene transfer. If multiple foreign genes from the same eukaryotic lineage are found in a given genome, it is increasingly interpreted as concerted gene transfers during a cryptic endosymbiosis in the organism's evolutionary past, also known as "endosymbiotic gene transfer" or EGT. A number of provocative hypotheses of lost or serially replaced endosymbionts have been advanced; to date, however, these inferences largely have been post-hoc interpretations of genomic-wide conflicts among gene trees. With data sets as large and complex as eukaryotic genome sequences, it is critical to examine alternative explanations for intra-genome phylogenetic conflicts, particularly how much conflicting signal is expected from directional biases and statistical noise. The availability of genome-level data both permits and necessitates phylogenomics that test explicit, a priori predictions of horizontal gene transfer, using rigorous statistical methods and clearly defined experimental controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Czechia 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
France 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 72 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Philosophy 1 1%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,511
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,875
of 129,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#55
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.