↓ Skip to main content

Selecting synaptic partners: GRASPing the role of UNC-6/netrin

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selecting synaptic partners: GRASPing the role of UNC-6/netrin
Published in
BMC Biology, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-9-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

QueeLim Ch'ng

Abstract

Forming synaptic connections of the appropriate strength between specific neurons is crucial for constructing neural circuits to control behavior. A recent paper in Neural Development describes the use of a synapse-specific label in Caenorhabditis elegans to implicate local UNC-6/netrin signaling in this developmental process. Thus, as well as their well known roles in cell migration and axon guidance, UNC-6/netrin signals distinguish an appropriate synaptic partner from other potential targets.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 21%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 14 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Neuroscience 5 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#817,224
of 3,628,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#339
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,248
of 97,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.