↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenomic analyses predict sistergroup relationship of nucleariids and Fungi and paraphyly of zygomycetes with significant support

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenomic analyses predict sistergroup relationship of nucleariids and Fungi and paraphyly of zygomycetes with significant support
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Liu, Emma T Steenkamp, Henner Brinkmann, Lise Forget, Hervé Philippe, B Franz Lang

Abstract

Resolving the evolutionary relationships among Fungi remains challenging because of their highly variable evolutionary rates, and lack of a close phylogenetic outgroup. Nucleariida, an enigmatic group of amoeboids, have been proposed to emerge close to the fungal-metazoan divergence and might fulfill this role. Yet, published phylogenies with up to five genes are without compelling statistical support, and genome-level data should be used to resolve this question with confidence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Germany 3 3%
Spain 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 98 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Researcher 31 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,611
of 177,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.