↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner fusion for treating osteoarthrosis following carpal trauma: a prospective randomized study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between proximal row carpectomy and four-corner fusion for treating osteoarthrosis following carpal trauma: a prospective randomized study
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000100010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edgard Novaes França Bisneto, Maura Cristina Freitas, Emygdio José Leomil de Paula, Rames Mattar Jr, Arnaldo Valdir Zumiotti

Abstract

To compare the functional results of carpectomy and four-corner fusion surgical procedures for treating osteoarthrosis following carpal trauma.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,767,157
of 20,831,134 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#165
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,344
of 365,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,831,134 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.