↓ Skip to main content

Using urban forest assessment tools to model bird habitat potential

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using urban forest assessment tools to model bird habitat potential
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.006
Authors

Susannah B. Lerman, Keith H. Nislow, David J. Nowak, Stephen DeStefano, David I. King, D. Todd Jones-Farrand

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Taiwan 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 186 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Student > Master 37 19%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 12 6%
Other 53 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 38%
Environmental Science 76 38%
Unspecified 17 9%
Design 13 7%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 12 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,453,889
of 12,667,869 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#434
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,362
of 315,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,667,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.