You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Envenomation by the Malagasy colubrid snake Langaha madagascariensis
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, January 2008
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||3||18%|
|Student > Master||2||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||41%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||6%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||6%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2020.
All research outputs
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 156,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them