↓ Skip to main content

Dyslipidemia and maternal obesity: Prematurity and neonatal prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dyslipidemia and maternal obesity: Prematurity and neonatal prognosis
Published in
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.64.03.264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento, Guilherme Dienstmann, Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza, Thiago Ribeiro e Silva, Raquel Fleig, Jean Carl Silva

Abstract

To identify the changes caused by dyslipidemia and obesity in pregnancy suggesting causes for premature birth, and the prognosis for the newborn. Systematic review based on the Medline, Lilacs, Embase and Cochrane library databases between 1996 and 2016. The search for studies included the following keywords: "dyslipidemia, pregnancy, obesity, preterm birth." A protocol was programmed and a protocol for inclusion/exclusion of studies was implemented. Of the 5,789 articles initially selected between March 1996 and July 2016, only 32 were in accordance with the established criteria. Of these, 28.12% discussed risk factors of prematurity; 37.50%, metabolic alterations and gestational dyslipidemia; 21.87%, dyslipidemic complications in preterm birth; and 12,50%, lipid metabolism, glycemic and placental transfer. There is a reduced adaptation of obese pregnant women to the metabolic changes of gestation. This favors dyslipidemic intercurrences in the mother, which, directly or indirectly, suggests the occurrence of premature births and high lipid transfer to the fetus. Therefore, preterm newborns, whose mothers were dyslipidemic during pregnancy, have greater risk of epicardial fat, both in early (first year of life) and in later (adult) phases of life.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#11,384,157
of 12,799,521 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#349
of 464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,445
of 274,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,799,521 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.