You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of ultrasound-guided modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture for peripherally inserted central catheter: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0742-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
ZhanZhan Li, LiZhang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Puerto Rico | 2 | 25% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 48% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,997,226
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,901
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,674
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#340
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.