You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jilske A. Huijben, Victor Volovici, Maryse C. Cnossen, Iain K. Haitsma, Nino Stocchetti, Andrew I. R. Maas, David K. Menon, Ari Ercole, Giuseppe Citerio, David Nelson, Suzanne Polinder, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Hester F. Lingsma, Mathieu van der Jagt, CENTER-TBI investigators and participants |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
Spain | 4 | 8% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 2 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 32 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
Scientists | 8 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 27% |
Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 42 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,370,858
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,170
of 6,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,465
of 343,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.