↓ Skip to main content

I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2973 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Zhang

Abstract

Prediction of 3-dimensional protein structures from amino acid sequences represents one of the most important problems in computational structural biology. The community-wide Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) experiments have been designed to obtain an objective assessment of the state-of-the-art of the field, where I-TASSER was ranked as the best method in the server section of the recent 7th CASP experiment. Our laboratory has since then received numerous requests about the public availability of the I-TASSER algorithm and the usage of the I-TASSER predictions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,973 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 15 <1%
United States 14 <1%
Brazil 12 <1%
Germany 8 <1%
France 6 <1%
India 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
Other 36 1%
Unknown 2864 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 697 23%
Student > Master 461 16%
Student > Bachelor 390 13%
Researcher 360 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 172 6%
Other 380 13%
Unknown 513 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 877 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 808 27%
Chemistry 229 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 74 2%
Computer Science 62 2%
Other 326 11%
Unknown 597 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,422,555
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,089
of 7,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,087
of 172,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.