↓ Skip to main content

Seizures and hypothermia: Importance of electroencephalographic monitoring and considerations for treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seizures and hypothermia: Importance of electroencephalographic monitoring and considerations for treatment
Published in
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2015.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraldine B. Boylan, Liudmila Kharoshankaya, Courtney J. Wusthoff

Abstract

Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is a common cause of seizures in neonates. Despite the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia, seizure rates are similar to those reported in the pre-therapeutic hypothermia era. However, the seizure profile has been altered resulting in a lower overall seizure burden, shorter individual seizure durations, and seizures that are harder to detect. Electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring is the gold standard for detecting all seizures in neonates and this is even more critical in neonates who are cooled, as they are often sedated, making seizures more difficult to detect. Several studies have shown that the majority of seizures in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia remain subclinical, thus requiring EEG monitoring for diagnosis. Amplitude-integrated EEG monitoring is useful but shorter duration seizures are more likely to be missed. Evidence is emerging about the pharmacokinetic profile of routinely used antiepileptic drugs during therapeutic hypothermia and some modifications have been suggested, particularly for lidocaine use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 27 29%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 54%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,356,550
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
#215
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,667
of 369,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.