↓ Skip to main content

Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration

Overview of attention for article published in Restoration Ecology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 1,386)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration
Published in
Restoration Ecology, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/rec.12186
Authors

Thomas M. Newsome, Guy-Anthony Ballard, Mathew S. Crowther, Justin A. Dellinger, Peter J. S. Fleming, Alistair S. Glen, Aaron C. Greenville, Chris N. Johnson, Mike Letnic, Katherine E. Moseby, Dale G. Nimmo, Michael Paul Nelson, John L. Read, William J. Ripple, Euan G. Ritchie, Carolyn R. Shores, Arian D. Wallach, Aaron J. Wirsing, Christopher R. Dickman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 4%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 134 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Other 11 8%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 38%
Environmental Science 50 35%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 24 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#188,883
of 19,248,133 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#10
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,666
of 228,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,248,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them