You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0266-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Bravo, Alessia Calzolari, Paola De Castro, Laurence Mabile, Federica Napolitani, Anna Maria Rossi, Anne Cambon-Thomsen |
| Abstract |
Many biomedical publications refer to data obtained from collections of biosamples. Sharing such bioresources (biological samples, data, and databases) is paramount for the present governance of research. Recognition of the effort involved in generating, maintaining, and sharing high quality bioresources is poorly organized, which does not encourage sharing. At publication level, the recognition of such resources is often neglected and/or highly heterogeneous. This is a true handicap for the traceability of bioresource use. The aim of this article is to propose, for the first time, a guideline for reporting bioresource use in research articles, named CoBRA: Citation of BioResources in journal Articles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Spain | 5 | 11% |
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 72% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,007,255
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#705
of 3,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,485
of 260,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#17
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.