The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biomarkers of contaminant exposure in common terns and black‐crowned night herons in the Great Lakes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1002/etc.5620120615 |
Authors |
David J. Hoffman, Gregory J. Smith, Barnett A. Rattner |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 29% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 8 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,220,555
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#261
of 5,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,145
of 108,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry
#20
of 1,031 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,031 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.