↓ Skip to main content

Adapting California's Ecosystems to a Changing Climate

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adapting California's Ecosystems to a Changing Climate
Published in
BioScience, February 2015
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biu233
Authors

Elizabeth A. Chornesky, David D. Ackerly, Paul Beier, Frank W. Davis, Lorraine E. Flint, Joshua J. Lawler, Peter B. Moyle, Max A. Moritz, Mary Scoonover, Kristin Byrd, Pelayo Alvarez, Nicole E. Heller, Elisabeth R. Micheli, Stuart B. Weiss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Student > Master 14 11%
Professor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 15 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,126,704
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,220
of 2,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,961
of 222,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.