You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adapting California's Ecosystems to a Changing Climate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biu233 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Chornesky, David D. Ackerly, Paul Beier, Frank W. Davis, Lorraine E. Flint, Joshua J. Lawler, Peter B. Moyle, Max A. Moritz, Mary Scoonover, Kristin Byrd, Pelayo Alvarez, Nicole E. Heller, Elisabeth R. Micheli, Stuart B. Weiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 66 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,195
of 2,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,741
of 273,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.