You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservative interventions for preventing clinically detectable upper‐limb lymphoedema in patients who are at risk of developing lymphoedema after breast cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009765.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martijn M Stuiver, Marieke R ten Tusscher, Carla S Agasi‐Idenburg, Cees Lucas, Neil K Aaronson, Patrick MM Bossuyt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 535 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 531 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 10% |
| Researcher | 35 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 86 | 16% |
| Unknown | 166 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 108 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 5% |
| Psychology | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Unknown | 183 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,970,825
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,197
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,668
of 372,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.