↓ Skip to main content

Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006438.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis den Hartog, Alphons HM Dur, Wim E Tuinebreijer, Robert W Kreis

Abstract

Incisional hernias occur frequently after abdominal surgery and can cause serious complications. The choice of a type of open operative repair is controversial. Determining the type of open operative repair is controversial, as the recurrence rate may be as high as 54%.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Researcher 30 14%
Other 22 11%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 51 25%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 47 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,750
of 96,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.