↓ Skip to main content

石膏注入による直腸異物の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
304 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
石膏注入による直腸異物の1例
Published in
Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine), May 2013
DOI 10.11231/jaem.33.773
Authors

岩田 力, 磯谷 正敏, 原田 徹, 金岡 祐次, 亀井 桂太郎, 前田 敦行, 高山 祐一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 304 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 257. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#145,557
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#2
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#879
of 205,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi (Journal of Abdominal Emergency Medicine)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.